Solar farms across the UK are home to a remarkable variety of wildlife. National surveys coordinated by Solar Energy UK have recorded 94 bird species, 29 butterfly and bumblebee species, and 8 mammal species across 124 solar sites. Over 50% of surveyed solar farms host red-listed birds including skylark, yellowhammer, linnet, corn bunting, and nightingale. Brown hares, a species of conservation concern, are found on around 40% of sites, while the small heath butterfly and cinnabar moth have been recorded at multiple locations.

Research from the RSPB and University of Cambridge confirms that well-managed solar farms support up to three times more birds than intensive arable farmland. Lancaster University studies show bumblebee populations up to four times higher on sites managed as wildflower meadows. These findings reflect the fundamental change that occurs when land shifts from intensive agriculture to the low-disturbance environment of a solar farm, free from pesticides, fertilisers, and regular ploughing for 25-30 years.

This guide catalogues the wildlife found on UK solar farms, explains why these sites support diverse species, identifies which animals benefit most, and addresses concerns about potential negative impacts on certain wildlife like bats. Whether you are a conservation professional, a landowner considering solar development, or simply curious about what lives among the panels, this guide provides the complete picture.

Quick Overview

Bird species recorded94 species (Solar Habitat 2025)
Red-listed birds observed20% of species; 50%+ of sites
Average birds per solar farm86 individuals (up to 238)
Butterfly and bumblebee species29 species; ~3,000 individuals
Mammal species8 species recorded
Sites surveyed (2025)124 solar farms

Birds on Solar Farms

Survey Findings

MetricSolar Habitat 2025 Data
Solar farms surveyed63 (bird surveys)
Total species recorded94
Individual birds counted~7,500
Average per site86 birds
Maximum at one site238 birds
Species range per site9-39 species

Conservation Status of Birds Found

StatusShare of SpeciesWhat It Means
Red-listed20%Most endangered; urgent conservation concern
Amber-listed28%Medium conservation concern
Green-listed52%Not of conservation concern

Red-Listed Birds on Solar Farms

SpeciesPrevalenceNotes
SkylarkCommon; ~50% of sitesGround-nesting; iconic farmland bird
YellowhammerCommon; ~50% of sitesHedgerow specialist; seed-eater
LinnetCommon; 50%+ of sitesSmall finch; beautiful song
StarlingRegularFeeding flocks; invertebrate-eater
Corn buntingOccasionalEast Anglia; declining heavily
Cirl buntingRareUK’s rarest resident farmland bird; Devon only
NightingaleRarePossible breeding at one site
Spotted flycatcherOccasionalSummer visitor; insect-eater

Amber-Listed Birds

SpeciesHabitat Use
Grey wagtailNear water features; ponds
WhitethroatHedgerows; scrub
WrenDense vegetation; margins
Willow warblerScrub; hedgerows
DunnockHedgerows; ground layer

Why Solar Farms Support Birds

FactorBenefit for Birds
No pesticidesAbundant invertebrate prey
Undisturbed groundSafe nesting for ground-nesters
HedgerowsNesting sites; food; shelter
Seed-rich vegetationWinter food source
Fenced perimeterReduced predator access
Low human disturbanceBreeding success improved

Bird Abundance by Habitat Type

HabitatPredicted Birds per 4ha
Solar farm (mixed habitat)31.5 birds
Solar farm (simple habitat)17 birds
Arable farmland11.9 birds

Mammals on Solar Farms

Species Recorded

SpeciesPrevalenceConservation Status
Brown hare40% of sites; most commonSpecies of conservation concern
Roe deerRegularCommon
Fallow deerOccasionalCommon
Muntjac deerOccasionalCommon (non-native)
BadgerRegularProtected
FoxRegularCommon
RabbitCommonCommon
Common shrewPresent but under-recordedCommon
Field volePresent but under-recordedCommon
Water voleRare; where ponds presentEndangered
WeaselOccasionalCommon

Brown Hares

AspectDetails
Prevalence on solar farms40% of surveyed sites; most common mammal
Conservation statusSpecies of Principal Importance (NERC Act 2006)
Population trendUK population declined 75%+ since 1960s
Why solar farms suit themLow disturbance; diverse vegetation; safe from agricultural machinery
Survey note“Solar farms offer ideal habitats for this declining species”

Small Mammals

SpeciesHabitatNotes
Field voleTussocky grasslandKey prey for owls and kestrels
Bank voleHedgerows; marginsLikely present; under-recorded
Wood mouseMargins; hedgerowsLikely present; under-recorded
Common shrewGround layer; dense vegetationRecorded at some sites
Harvest mouseTall grass; marginsPotential; requires survey

Why Small Mammals May Be Under-recorded

FactorExplanation
Survey timingDaytime surveys miss nocturnal species
VisibilitySmall mammals hidden in vegetation
Survey methodsStandard monitoring doesn’t include trapping
Likely realitySmall mammal populations probably higher than recorded

Invertebrates on Solar Farms

Survey Findings

For a deep dive on the pollinator side of solar farm biodiversity, see our guide to pollinator-friendly solar farms – which covers bumblebee and butterfly management in more detail.

MetricSolar Habitat 2025 Data
Butterfly and bumblebee species29
Individual insects counted~3,000
Total invertebrate species47
Groups recordedButterflies, bumblebees, moths, dragonflies, solitary bees

Butterflies

SpeciesStatusNotes
Meadow brownCommonMost frequently recorded species
Small heathSpecies of Principal ImportanceFound at 10+ sites; declining nationally
RingletCommonGrassland specialist
GatekeeperCommonHedgerow edges
Common blueCommonWhere bird’s-foot trefoil present
Small skipperCommonGrassland; margins

Bumblebees

FindingSource
4x higher density on wildflower-managed sitesLancaster University
2x higher foraging and nestingCompared to wildflower margins only
Benefit to surrounding cropsEnhanced pollination within 1km radius
Future refuge potentialCould support populations under land-use change

Moths

SpeciesStatusNotes
Cinnabar mothSpecies of conservation concernRecorded at 7+ sites
Six-spot burnetCommonDay-flying; grassland
Various nocturnal mothsMixedUnder-recorded; night surveys rare

Dragonflies and Damselflies

SpeciesStatusNotes
Norfolk hawkerRare; protectedRecorded where ponds present
Scarce chaserRareAssociated with ponds
Common darterCommonWhere water features exist
Blue-tailed damselflyCommonPond margins

Why Solar Farms Support Invertebrates

FactorBenefit
No pesticidesInsect populations not suppressed
WildflowersNectar and pollen sources
Varied vegetation structureDifferent niches for different species
Undisturbed soilGround-nesting bees can establish
PondsAquatic invertebrates; dragonflies
Log pilesBeetle habitat; overwintering sites

Reptiles and Amphibians

Reptiles

SpeciesStatusSolar Farm Habitat
Slow wormProtectedMargins; log piles; compost heaps
Grass snakeProtectedMargins; near ponds; egg-laying sites
Common lizardProtectedSouth-facing banks; log piles
AdderProtectedPossible on heathland-adjacent sites

Amphibians

SpeciesStatusSolar Farm Habitat
Great crested newtEuropean Protected SpeciesPonds; terrestrial habitat within 500m
Smooth newtProtectedPonds; damp margins
Common toadSpecies of Principal ImportanceBreeding ponds; terrestrial habitat
Common frogProtectedPonds; wet margins

Great Crested Newts on Solar Sites

AspectDetails
Legal protectionWildlife and Countryside Act; Conservation of Habitats Regulations
Pre-construction surveysRequired if ponds within 500m
Solar farm benefitUndisturbed terrestrial habitat; new ponds can be created
Case study exampleOne site described as potential “newt haven”
District Level LicensingStrategic approach available in England

Why Solar Farms Suit Reptiles and Amphibians

FactorBenefit
No ploughingHibernation sites undisturbed
Varied microclimatesBasking spots; shaded areas
Pond creationBreeding habitat for amphibians
Log pilesShelter; egg-laying for grass snakes
Tussocky marginsCover from predators

Bats: A Mixed Picture

Research Findings

StudyFinding
University of Bristol (2023)Bat activity lower at solar farm sites than control sites
Bat Conservation TrustCollecting evidence on impacts; research ongoing
Potential concernPanels may disrupt foraging; confusion with water

Why Bats May Avoid Solar Farms

TheoryExplanation
Smooth surface confusionBats may mistake panels for water
Reduced insect availabilityPossible; though other studies show more insects
Habitat fragmentationPanels may interrupt flight paths
Acoustic interferencePossible echolocation disruption (unconfirmed)

Mitigation for Bats

MeasurePurpose
Dark corridorsUnlit flight paths through/around site
Hedgerow connectivityMaintain linear features for commuting
Insect-friendly plantingBoost prey availability
Tree retentionRoosting opportunities
Buffer zonesDistance from known roosts

Automated Monitoring

DevelopmentDetails
Trial siteWestmill Solar Park, Oxfordshire
LeadLancaster University
MonitoringAutomated detection of bats, birds, invertebrates
BenefitMore frequent data than annual surveys

Case Studies

Sawmills Solar Farm, Devon: Cirl Buntings

AspectDetails
SpeciesCirl bunting (UK’s rarest resident farmland bird)
RangeOnly found in small area of South Devon and Cornwall
OutcomeSuccessfully attracted to solar farm
ManagementTargeted habitat creation for species requirements

South Devon Solar Farm: Butterflies

AspectDetails
Finding40-fold increase in butterflies observed
ManagementWildflower meadow; conservation grazing
TimeframeSeveral years post-installation

East Anglian Fens Study

AspectDetails
StudyRSPB/University of Cambridge (2025)
Sites6 solar farms; 23.2km of transects
Finding3x more birds on mixed-habitat solar vs arable
SpeciesCorn bunting, yellowhammer, linnet observed

Wildlife Monitoring

Standardised Approach

AspectDetails
FrameworkStandardised Approach to Monitoring Biodiversity on Solar Farms
DeveloperSolar Energy UK; Lancaster University
PurposeConsistent methodology; comparable data
Uptake124 sites reported data in 2025

Survey Methods

GroupMethod
BirdsBreeding Bird Survey transects; point counts
Butterflies/beesTransect walks in suitable weather
PlantsQuadrat surveys (1m²)
MammalsIncidental records; camera traps emerging
ReptilesArtificial refugia surveys

Future Monitoring Developments

DevelopmentStatus
Automated acoustic monitoringBeing trialled for bats, birds
Camera trapsIncreasing use for mammals
eDNAPotential for pond surveys
Research-intensive sitesProposed for more detailed study

Management for Wildlife

High-Value Practices

If you’re a farmer or landowner considering whether to host a solar farm, see our guide to solar panels for farms – it covers lease terms and the wider agricultural context alongside biodiversity management.

PracticeWildlife Benefit
Wildflower meadow creationPollinators; seed-eating birds
Hedgerow plantingNesting birds; mammals; connectivity
Pond creationAmphibians; dragonflies; water birds
Conservation grazingVaried sward; dung invertebrates
Tussocky marginsSmall mammals; reptiles; ground-nesters
Log pilesInvertebrates; reptiles; fungi

Management Categories and Wildlife

CategoryInvertebrate RichnessBird Richness
Category 2 (strong focus)HighestHighest
Category 3 (some consideration)MediumMedium
Category 4 (basic only)LowerLower

Seasonal Considerations

SeasonWildlife ActivityManagement Notes
SpringBird nesting; amphibian breedingAvoid disturbance; delay cutting
SummerPeak invertebrates; fledglingsAllow flowering; minimal mowing
AutumnSeed set; migration; dispersalConservation grazing can begin
WinterOverwintering; limited activityMaintain cover; sheep grazing

Concerns and Considerations

Potential Negative Impacts

ConcernEvidenceMitigation
Bat activity reductionBristol study shows lower activityDark corridors; hedgerow connectivity
Construction disturbanceTemporary during buildSeasonal timing; ecological supervision
Panel reflectionPossible confusion for some speciesAnti-reflective coatings available
Fencing barriersMay block some mammal movementGaps for small mammals; badger gates

Sites to Avoid

Site TypeReason
SSSIsAlready high nature value
Important bird areasCritical for specific species
Ancient woodlandIrreplaceable habitat
Species-rich grasslandAlready biodiverse
Active breeding sitesRare species; protected

Pre-Construction Surveys Required

Water-based solar projects face a different set of ecological questions from the ground-mount sites covered here. Our guide to floating solar farms covers the wildlife and habitat implications for reservoirs and other water bodies.

SurveyWhen Required
Great crested newtPonds within 500m
Bat roost assessmentTrees/buildings affected
Breeding bird surveyAll sites
Reptile surveySuitable habitat present
Badger surveyAll sites

Frequently Asked Questions

Basic Questions

QuestionAnswer
Do solar farms harm wildlife?Well-managed solar farms support more wildlife than intensive farmland
What animals live on solar farms?94 bird species, 8 mammals, 29 butterfly/bee species recorded
Are rare species found on solar farms?Yes; 20% of bird species are red-listed; cirl buntings at one site
Do bats use solar farms?Research shows lower activity; mitigation recommended

Management Questions

QuestionAnswer
What management is best for wildlife?Wildflower meadows; hedgerows; conservation grazing; ponds
How is wildlife monitored?Standardised surveys; 124 sites reported in 2025
Can wildlife surveys be required?Yes; BNG requires 30-year monitoring

Summary

Wildlife GroupKey Finding
Birds94 species; 3x more than arable; 20% red-listed
Mammals8 species; brown hare on 40% of sites
Butterflies/bees29 species; 4x more bumblebees with good management
Reptiles/amphibiansBenefit from undisturbed habitat; pond creation helps
BatsPotential concern; lower activity recorded; mitigation needed
OverallWell-managed solar farms support significant wildlife populations

Solar farms across the UK are proving to be important refuges for wildlife, particularly in landscapes dominated by intensive agriculture. The Solar Habitat 2025 report documented 94 bird species, including red-listed skylark, yellowhammer, linnet, and even the rare cirl bunting and nightingale. Brown hares, a species of conservation concern that has declined by over 75% since the 1960s, are found on 40% of surveyed solar farms. Nearly 3,000 butterflies and bumblebees representing 29 species were recorded, with bumblebee densities up to four times higher on well-managed sites.

The key to wildlife success on solar farms is management rather than the panels themselves. Sites managed as wildflower meadows with hedgerows and conservation grazing support far more species than those maintained as simple turf grass. The RSPB/Cambridge study found that mixed-habitat solar farms supported nearly three times as many birds as nearby arable farmland. This reflects the fundamental shift from intensive agriculture to a low-disturbance environment free from pesticides, fertilisers, and annual ploughing.

Not all wildlife responds equally to solar farms. While most groups benefit, research from the University of Bristol suggests bat activity may be lower at solar farm sites, possibly due to panel reflections confusing echolocation. This highlights the importance of mitigation measures including dark corridors, hedgerow connectivity, and maintaining links to known roosts. Ongoing automated monitoring trials at sites like Westmill Solar Park will help build understanding of these effects.

With over 50% of surveyed solar farms now hosting red-listed birds and clear evidence linking biodiversity-focused management to wildlife abundance, solar farms are emerging as accidental nature reserves. As the Biodiversity Net Gain requirement embeds long-term monitoring and habitat management into planning conditions, this wildlife potential is increasingly being realised by design rather than by accident.

The biodiversity case for solar farms is strongest when paired with active habitat management – wildflower meadows, hedgerows, ponds, conservation grazing. For a farmer or landowner, this isn’t a bolt-on; it’s part of why a solar lease can be more nature-positive than continuing with intensive arable or dairy on marginal land.

If you’re evaluating community-scale solar or considering investment in a project, our guide to community solar projects covers how ownership models affect management choices – cooperatives and community-benefit societies often prioritise biodiversity outcomes more than purely commercial developers.